The treaty separation of the word Maharshi is Maha + Rishi and its conjunction is - Maharshi. Those who composed Vedic mantras are called Rishi (sage) and those who later performed various works on those mantras such as study and teaching are called Muni. There are 355 known sages and a few others unknown, but not all of them are called Maharshi (great sage); Those who are the best and the greatest among the sages are known as Maharshis. So if he wants to be a Maharshi, he has to not only compose Vedic mantras, he has to be the best or chief among the sages. Let's see in this formula whether Dayananda Saraswati is a Maharshi or not?
I am asking the Arya Samajis or the Dayanand Supporter who write or propagate Dayananda Saraswati as Maharshi, did Dayanand Saraswati compose Vedic mantras?
The answer is NO.
So the one who did not compose the mantras of the Vedas, he is not a Rishi, how did he become a Maharshi?
I am asking this question to the Arya Samajis or there supporters very strictly, if they can give a satisfactory answer to this question, then they have the right to write or promote Dayananda Saraswati as Maharshi, otherwise they have no moral right to call or write Dayananda as a Maharshi.
Just as Vaishnav Society has deceived the Traditional (Sanatani) Hindu Society by promoting Chaitanyadev as the incarnation or god of KaliYug and is still doing so, similarly Arya Samajis has been deceiving the Traditional Hindu Society by promoting Dayananda as Maharshi. Although Chaitanyadev's personal life is not to be followable for Hindus, his disciples are instructed to sing the name of Krishna in praise.
Dayanand Saraswati, on the other hand, did not accept Krishna as God, nor did he acknowledge Krishna as an incarnation. Dayanand Saraswati considered Krishna to be a Great Yogi, on the other hand he considered himself to be a (greater sage) Maharshi than Shri Krishna! This belief is cherished in the hearts of some fools, who are known in Hindu society as Arya Samajist.
Dayananda Saraswati did not compose any mantra in the Vedas, so he is not a Rishi (sage), there is no question of being a Maharishi; On the contrary, Dayananda is a liar and a deceiver, because he has not only changed the translation of many verses of the Manu Sanhita in his Satyartha Prakash, but has also distorted many Veda Mantras and tried to establish his own beliefs and opinions through them.
However, Dayanand Saraswati is a liar and a deceiver, he has revealed and proved through his name by putting the word Maharshi before his name. I do not believe that Dayanand did not know the meaning of the word Maharshi and to whom it applies; he must have known it and knowingly put the word Maharshi before his name in order to take himself to their level, which was later propagated by his followers. But he is not a Maharshi (Great Sage), not even a Rishi (sage); Because he did not compose the Vedic mantra, then how can he put the word Maharshi before his name and propagate it?
Dayanand Saraswati, in his Satyartha Prakash, criticizes almost everything prevalent in the Traditional (Sanatani) Hindu society and tries to disprove them and tries to establish himself and his opinion above all else. But Dayananda Saraswati's almost all views or thoughts are erroneous, and with those erroneous views or thoughts he has promoted himself as Maharshi; where he is not a Rishi.
Pic. taken from wikipedia
All over the world only this Arya Samajist chant Aham instead of OM ! Dayanand is responsible for the distortion of Traditional (Sanatan) Om also.
Everyone gets the fruits of his deeds, Dayananda Saraswati has already get it and his followers will also get that. The Brahmo Samaj did not consider Lord Krishna to be God, so they are in the pages of history today, the same fate will befall the Arya Samaj.
Jay Shri Ram
Jay Shri Krishna
